In the quarterfinals of the Australian Open, defending champion and world number two, Rafael Nadal, prematurely set down his racket due to the sudden onset of a knee injury. For several seasons, the 23 year old has been afflicted with one form of physical ailment or another. After an extraordinary victory in 2008, last June, Nadal was unable to defend his title at Wimbledon due to tendonitis. As an individual who has exhibited exemplary conduct both on and off the court, there’s a noticeable void when a player of Nadal’s caliber is absent. Here are a few reasons why the game is better with Nadal.
With Andy Murray dominating from the very first stroke and only three games from a straight sets victory, there was little suspense as to the outcome of the quarterfinals. Still, with the Spaniard, there is often a sliver of hope for a comeback. One of Nadal’s most admirable attribute is his inherent belief, regardless of the score, that he is not vanquished until the last ball is struck. In Nadal’s psyche, there’s invariably that one shot which sparks the turning point in the match. It’s hard to bet against a man who last year in Australia after a thrilling five hour and 20 minute, five set semifinal defeated Roger Federer after another five setter with less than 24 hour turnaround.
If one were to browse the dictionary for the definition of driven or relentless, it would not be shocking to discover a photograph of Nadal. Whether in practice or in match situation, Nadal gives 1000% effort, a reflection of his perfectionist personality. There’s an ATP commercial which describes tennis players as “gladiators” on the pitch; perhaps no person epitomizes that description better than Nadal. Each time he steps on the court it seems a duel to the death.
While Nadal’s all-encompassing dedication is laudable, the intense manner he approaches the game has taken a toll on his body. Bouts of tendonitis in both knees have hampered Nadal’s movement. With the nature of his game, it’s inevitable that these structures will be under recurrent stress. Therefore, even for an athlete as talented as Nadal, it becomes impossible to compensate. One option could be for him to go on a lengthy sabbatical since resting is crucial for healing. The down side would be that his ranking would suffer. Sometimes, one wishes Nadal could trade in his knees for new ones every so many miles as he does his tennis shoes.
The injuries are unfortunate because over the years Nadal has grown as a player. He has incorporated different shots which have helped him succeed on surfaces other than clay. In some respects, Nadal’s resume is more well-rounded and accomplished than Federer’s. Nadal’s first major was at age 18 while Federer’s came at age 21.The Spaniard has an Olympic gold medal in singles and a couple of Davis Cup titles. On the contrary, there’s been a sporadic commitment by the Swiss to the Davis Cup.
In an era dominated by Federer, Nadal’s most significant contribution is proving that there are many ways to triumph. These two players have contrasting styles as well as differences in other areas. Nadal is a lefty, Federer a righty. The former plays two handed on the backhand wing while the latter has a one handed stroke. Federer moves as a quasi ballet dancer on court, Nadal more like a football player. But, there is common ground in that they are both passionate about their sport.
After one week of play, the cream of the ATP has risen to the top at the Australian Open. Although some had a tougher road than others, eight of the top seeds are still in the hunt. Here’s a look back at the tournament’s key moments to date.
After eight days, the Australian Open field has been narrowed. Here’s a synopsis of the early round stumbles, near misses and a crack at determining a champion.
From Rafael Nadal winning his first hardcourt major in Australia, to Roger Federer completing the career grand slam, to the emergence of a new major star Juan Martin Del Potro at the U.S. Open, 2009 was a year replete with ups and downs on the men’s tour. Here’s a flashback.
It’s that time of year when we look back at what transpired on the women’s tour over the past season and view ahead at the upcoming year. Here’s a recap of the great, the good and the down right ugly moments from 2009.
For better and for worse, the 2009 U.S. Open will be unforgettable on the ladies’ side for a multitude of reasons. Firstly, there was an unprecedented number of top seeds who stumbled in the early rounds. Secondly, the wackiness of the weather on the last weekend. Thirdly, 2005 champ Kim Clijsters’ remarkable run to the finals after a two year absence from the sport. Fourthly, Caroline Wozniacki becoming the first Danish player to reach the finals at a major. Lastly and lamentably, for what can only be labeled as ‘Serena Gate’.
After Roger Federer’s gut wrenching loss in the Wimbledon final last year, I felt obligated to impart on him some words of wisdom. This year, Andy Roddick was the one to draw the short straw in one of the most mesmerizing major matches ever. Deluded as it may seem, I would like to believe that my advice has contributed in some minute form to the success that Federer has been basking in of late. Considering that Roddick is a compatriot, I feel bound to take a crack at pushing him in the right direction.
For as long as I live, when I think of the red clay at Roland Garros, the picture that will always come to mind is that of Brazilian Gustavo Kuerten tracing the contours of a heart on the ground after his grueling five sets win over Swede Magnus Norman in the 2000 French Open final. 
Over the years, politics and sports have intersected many times. Perhaps the most infamous example is the 1972 Munich Olympics, when Israeli athletes were taken hostage by Palestinian radicals and subsequently killed in a rescue attempt. With tennis becoming more internationalized, these lines were destined to meet.
